Today we continue tackling those negative stereotypes about romance. I will offer one, followed by what I think is a reasonable response. Since the goal is to present a united front, not create an army of rhetoric-spouting puppets, you should feel free to add your own touch. (If, like me, you have smartass and/or aggressive tendencies, just remember to wedge the thoughtful response somewhere between the sarcasm and jabs to the larynx.)
Negative Stereotype #3
Romance is for frumpy middle-aged housewives.
Well-Reasoned Response
“Romance readers could not be a more diverse group. Romance is enjoyed by adolescents to great-grandmothers. Professional homemakers to professionals with a whole alphabet of degrees at the end of their names. Women. Men. In all countries. Of all races and religions. By people who may have nothing in common other than enjoyment of romance novels.
Romance is for everyone.”
Kerry’s Personal Touch
“Are there any housewives anymore? And are you implying that if such a domestic engineer exists, she’s sitting on her ass all day with a book instead of managing childcare and household responsibilities? Shame on you.”
Also All About Kerry
“I started reading romance novels when I was about ten, which is hardly middle-aged. I may be middle-aged now, but I don’t live in a house, and I’m not a wife. As for frumpy… don’t go there.”
I’ve given this stereotype all the thought I can, and this is the best I can come up with on my own. Contribute your suggestions to the movement, and together we will construct the Ultimate Defense of Romance!
