I’m at Romancing the Blog today, rousing the elderly rabble.
And I’ve scribbled most of a post about hoochie mama heroines in UF, exploring the motivation behind hypersexualizing them (well, a sentence or two took a stab at sounding all intellectual, but I actually used the term “hoochie mama,” so don’t expect a particularly scholarly discourse), but I didn’t have the heart to transcribe it after the beating UF as a genre took in the comments at an agent’s blog earlier this week.
Again, people: If you don’t like it, don’t read it. There’s no need to venture into the “they should stop publishing that crap I don’t like” territory, and most especially not into the “people only buy this crap because this crap is all that’s being published” territory because *slapSLAPslap* people who are not you (there are a few of those, you know—or maybe you don’t, judging by the razor-keen narrowness of your mind as expressed in some of your comments) might, perhaps, just maybe enjoy something that you don’t.
Even if far too many of the heroines are slaves to their genitals.







January 22nd, 2009 at 11:54 PM
Clearly, I missed some interesting controversy. But whining about the upsurge in popularity of a genre you don’t like is pointless to the point of making you look like an idiot. Don’t care to read urban fantasy? Wander into another section of the book store. I bet the shelves crammed end to end w/mysteries, romance, chick lit, YA, erotica, sci fi, biographies, memoirs, and horror would be flat-out shocked to hear that only UF is getting published.
January 25th, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Just read your post. WTF. Over.
Looking forward to the UF hoochie commentary. :uhuhuh: