Jul 26 2007
Romance Self-Defense I
Today we begin tackling those negative stereotypes about romance. I will offer one, followed by what I think is a reasonable response. Since the goal is to present a united front, not create an army of rhetoric-spouting puppets, you should feel free to add your own touch. (If, like me, you have smartass and/or aggressive tendencies, just remember to wedge the thoughtful response somewhere between the sarcasm and jabs to the larynx.)
Negative Stereotype #1
Romance is porn for women.
Well-Reasoned Response
“People read romance for a variety of reasons. Some read for pure escapist fantasy. Some read because they find it life- and hope-affirming. The many styles and subgenres of romance offer additional incentive to read, including all the qualities that lure people to mystery and humor and urban fantasy.
A statistically insignificant number read a 300-page book solely for the 5 pages of sex scenes.”
Kerry’s Personal Touch
“If it was porn of any kind, men would be reading it by the millions.”
I’ve given this stereotype all the thought I can, and this is the best I can come up with on my own. Contribute your suggestions to the movement, and together we will construct the Ultimate Defense of Romance!
9/30
11/4
11/4
11/25