Nov 16 2007
Doesn’t play well with others
I had this on the old Blogger blog. I’ve had it scheduled to post, as there has been a recent development that prompted me to resurrect and update, but I’ve pushed it back several times because more interesting inane drivel has come up. But since The League is all about crit groups this week, I take it as A Sign that the time has come.
The Lazarus Portion
I’ve taken the Serious Writer approach and joined a Crit Group, not once, not twice, but thrice. (I ignored my own advice, so now it’s four-ice.)
If your Crit Group helps you improve your writing, congratulations. You don’t know how lucky you are.
According to Crit Group #1, every word I wrote was crap. When this is the extent of the criticism being offered, it is not conducive to improvement.
“This scene is crap.”
“Okay, but what’s wrong with it?”
“It’s crap.”
Evidently nothing could be done to improve the reeking pile of feces that I had created, so I should just do the world a favor and hang up my pen. I’m pretty tough on myself, and while I have no delusions that my book is the best thing since peanut butter met chocolate in a convenient cup-shaped form, I am confident that it’s solid enough technically to withstand some legitimate hammering without shattering.
I suspect this variety of critique had a great deal to do with my genre of choice, since the tone of said critique took a nosedive only after the Romance issue became apparent. These were Serious Writers, after all, not… whatever writers of Romance are supposed to be.
According to Crit Group #2, every word I wrote was gold. When this is the extent of the criticism being offered, it is not conducive to improvement.
“This scene resonates with sheer geniosity.”
“Okay, but what’s wrong with it?”
“Not one thing. You’ll be a bestseller in no time if you just believe in yourself.”
Not that I don’t appreciate the ego stroke, but when I participated in the critiquing by pointing out another writer’s glaring grammatical errors and a lecture ensued to educate me that negativity has no place in this group, it became clear that I had stumbled into Happy Rainbow Kitty Land, where the shiny happy people live and the skies are not cloudy all day, and they wouldn’t have wrinkled their pert little noses even if I presented an actual reeking pile of feces for their consideration. These people had no interest in improving their writing (or even their spelling, apparently). They were there for pats on the head after their query letters for their unfinished first drafts returned with a big “hell no” for reasons they could not comprehend.
According to Crit Group #3, every word I wrote could be improved by simply changing it to a word chosen by The Collective. When this is the extent of the criticism being offered, it is not conducive to improvement.
“Start by changing this first line to ‘The clouds scudded inexorably across the sky.’”
“What clouds? They’re in a cave. Underground. Do you even know what ‘inexorably’ means?”
“It’s the group’s weekly Scudding Clouds Day, and ‘inexorably’ is the Word of the Decade. Assimilate or die.”
Yeah, baby, nothing like a little homogenization to make your book stand out from the crowd.
The Kerry Never Learns Portion
Why, oh why, do I never learn? Crit Group #4 was just like Crit Group #2, with one member of Crit Group #1 and one member of Crit Group #3 duking it out for dominance over the other members.
“Kerry, this is really good.”
“Thanks, but…”
“Romance is crap.”
“Everybody in this group is a romance writer, dumbass. Why are you even here?”
“Have you sent it to Agent Q?”
“Yes. No luck. Obviously there’s something wrong. I need somebody to tell me what it is. Seriously, I want to fix it. You won’t hurt my feelings.”
“I’ll tell you what the problem is. You need clouds on the first page. Scudding inexorably.”
“And this is why romance is crap. You need to dust off that urban fantasy you originally intended to be an animated series and concentrate on that.”
“Um, excuse me, but how do you even know about that?”
“Stalker.”
“Besides, at the heart of that story is a damaged but eternal ROMANCE.”
“Yeah, but there’s swords and shit.”
(My turn, but I am speechless with creeped-out-ness. I may have mentioned this project in passing, but not in any kind of detail, at least not in the past 3 or 4 years.)
“There’s swords and shit in what she gave us to read here. Dumbass stalker.”
“I wouldn’t know because I stopped at the kissy-kissy-goo-goo.”
“There’s a bloodbath on Page One!”
Crit Group #4 left me with a splitting headache, a loathing for humanity that took 3 days to fade, and a strong desire to obtain a restraining order. And no constructive changes to the manuscript.
You know what the single most useful resource has been for me? A bunch of guys sprawled around my living room, reading just the dialogue out loud. (Mostly actors, so they did it really well.)
No “this is perfect just the way it is.”
No “I can tell this is stupid without even reading it.”
A few crackups when it was supposed to be funny.
A few “that’s a little awkward, this would be more natural” spots, duly corrected.
One “Dammit, why do I have to be all the girls?”
And one “Um, sorry to interrupt, but why does Gabe have a pseudo-British accent?” / “Because he’s the James Bond of djinn, that’s why.”
(You want surreal? Find some guys willing to read a romance novel aloud with no sneering or snickering or embarrassment. I would have paid to watch the performance. I wish I’d thought to tape it.)
Now, if only I had a proofreader with keen enough eyes to catch sneaky little typos like bed and bet…


11/4
11/4
11/25