Phoenix Criminal Lawyer

Writerly Rivalry

Filed under: Uncategorized — Written by Kerry Allen on Monday, May 5th, 2008 @ 1:00 am

(Yes, I persist with the futile argument of reason.) 

Author A and Author B have completed manuscripts of equal brilliance and originality. They send them off to Fabulous Editor. The manuscripts sit side by side in Fabulous Editor’s inbox. Fabulous Editor grabs Author A’s manuscript first and falls ass over teakettle in love with it.

Does Fabulous Editor subsequently dump everything else in the inbox into the trash because she has found The Next Big Thing and never needs to look at another manuscript again?

No. Fabulous Editor continues mining for gold in the slush because Fabulous Editor intends to have a career beyond next year.

I have it on good authority Fabulous Editor would be running round the office screaming “This is the best fucking day of my life!” if the next manuscript she read also made her fall ass over teakettle in love with it.

Therefore, Author A’s manuscript is in no way impeding the publication of Author B’s manuscript.

Author A’s book and Author B’s book hit the shelves at the same time and, by happy coincidence, are placed side by side.

Discerning Reader finds both covers equally compelling and takes a look at both books. The back-cover copy is equally interesting. A quick skim of the contents suggests the books are equally brilliant and original, and Discerning Reader wants both. Equally.

So Discerning Reader buys both.

Yeah, but what if Discerning Reader has only enough money in her pocket for one book? Huh? What then, smarty pants?

Discerning Reader eeny-meeny-miney-moes her choice and comes back on payday to get the other one because she can’t get it out of her mind.

Therefore, Author A’s book is in no way impeding the sale of Author B’s book.

I don’t dispute the existence of competition, but it is not between writers. The competition is between reader interest and reader disinterest as it pertains to an individual story, whether that reader is an editor, an agent, a contest judge, or a book buyer. All of the above are looking for an engaging read—or two or twenty or eighty-six. No reader has ever bemoaned the agony of having too many exciting stories to choose from.

Once a writer sends a story out into the world, it stands or falls on its own. Nobody props it up. Nobody trips it. If it’s not universally embraced as a work of genius, that is not the fault of any writer other than the one who produced it, and spending even one minute of one day spewing about how someone else has ruined your chances of success is a waste of time you could have spent writing something new, something better, something that will juxtapose asses and teakettles everywhere.

(End rant. Please deposit nonsensical outbursts in the appropriate receptacle.)

3 Comments   -
  • Comment by Selah March | May 5, 2008 @ 11:17 am

    Was this outburst inspired by something in particular? (Tell me you’re not getting GH hate-mail again.)

  • Comment by Kerry Allen | May 5, 2008 @ 12:02 pm

    No, I think I’ve finally successfully blocked my #1 Fan’s IP addresses from home, work, grandma’s house, the prison library, etc. This is part residual from that garbage, part residual from “professional” people griping about how the promotional efforts of others are undermining their value as artistes, part random thought extrusion after the dropping the “imaginary competition” concept in PBW’s comment thread ages ago and listening to it clanking around in my head since then, and part “oh, they’re pumping crazy into the water supply now” after an agent posted another psychotic response to a rejection letter (because, as we all know, that’s the best way to convince someone of your genius if they failed to recognize it previously).
    .
    There just seems to be a lot of “blame everybody but myself for my discontent” going around lately. How can you have no control over your own life but believe somebody else does? And why would you think somebody else would want anything to do with your life, much less sabotage it? There are about half a dozen psychiatric disorders going on there.
    .
    Hence, Ranty McRantypants.

  • Comment by Selah March | May 5, 2008 @ 2:42 pm

    Well. Okay then. :booyah:

Leave your comment

© Kerry Allen